WebMar 23, 2024 · Jonathan MS Pearce’s new book The Resurrection: A Critical Examination of the Easter Story is due out imminently, and it has garnered some great endorsements, as follows: “Hitchens’s Razor, not Bayes’s Theorem, is the proper tool to use against the “absolute baselessness” of the resurrection belief (per David F. Strauss, as … Laird's book is the perfect foil to the writing of Feser, Aquinas and other natural-law adherents past and present. “...an intellectual banquet of concepts, principles, arguments, and skeptical objections concerning religion and morality that draws upon the ideas of two of the greatest philosophers of western thought: Aristotle and Aquinas ...
Response To A Tippling Philosopher On Act and Potency
WebJun 18, 2024 · Although I think Gunther Laird presents what is closest to the definitive refutation of Thomistic Natural Law theory in his book The Unnecessary Science A … WebNov 14, 2024 · [Provided by the author, Gunther Laird.] Category: Atheism • Gunther Laird. Tags: Gunther Laird • The Unnecessary Science. Article by: onusloom. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website. office municipal des sports issy
The Unnecessary Science OnusLoom
WebA thoroughly fascinating critique Gunther Laird is a very good writer, and this book is a commendable exploration and critique of the Natural Law view espoused by Edward Feser. Now, I must admit that I'm not particularly familiar with the philosophical tradition that Laird criticizes here. Indeed, the reader of this review is advised to read it ... WebFeb 23, 2024 · By onusloom • Feb 23, 2024 • No comments. Ed Buckner is a good man, not least because he kindly agreed to write the forward to the recent anthology of Patheos Nonreligious writers, Not Seeing God: Atheism in the 21st Century, released last month. Here is his foreword (and a massive thanks to him): WebJul 7, 2024 · Gunther Laird. July 12, 2024 @ 7:45 am · Reply. Hi Johannes, Looking it up it seems that the New Scientist has mentioned gluons being a virtual particle, and that seems accurate. So, fair enough, I need to concede that fundamental particles aren’t candidates for having existential inertia. office municipal habitation longueuil